Research Integrity and Compliance
- Ethical Conduct of Research Policy
- Applying for Human Research Ethics Procedure
- Applying for Animal Research Ethics Procedure
- Institutional Biosafety Procedure
- Authorship Procedure
- Research Integrity Policy
- Research Integrity & Misconduct Procedure
- Research Data Management Procedure
- Research Data Management Policy
- Intellectual Property Policy
- Disclosing and Exploiting Intellectual Property Procedure
- Disbursement of Net Revenue from Intellectual Property Commercialisation Procedure
- Research Export Controls Procedure
- Research Compliance Committees External Members Allowance Procedure
- Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme Procedure
- Sanctions Compliance Procedure
- Printable PDF Version
- Legislative Context
- Policy Statement
- General Principles of Responsible Conduct
- Additional Legislative Requirements for Responsible Conduct of Research
- Conscientious Objection Principle
- Management of Research Data and Primary Material
- Supervision of Research Trainees
- Publication and Dissemination of Research Findings
- Peer Review
- Conflicts of Interest
- Collaborative Research Across Institutions
- Recognition of the Rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples
- Breaches of the Code, Misconduct and the Framework for Resolving Allegations
- Research Integrity Training
- Supporting Documents
To ensure research conducted under the auspices of Federation University Australia incorporates the values of the University (as stated in The Charter) and conforms to the requirements of The Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research.
This policy applies to all research conducted by Federation University Australia.
The policy applies to:
- All staff, including sessional staff, employed by the University or any controlled entity
- All students
- All former staff of the University (or any controlled entity), where such staff have been involved in activities that are the subject of an allegation of misconduct.
- All former students, where such students have been involved in activities that are the subject of an allegation of misconduct.
- All persons, including adjunct staff, honorary staff, visitors or volunteers, where such persons have been involved in activities that are the subject of an allegation of misconduct.
- Federation University Australia Act 2010
- The Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research, 2018
- National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007
- Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes 2013
- Gene Technology Act 2000
- Gene Technology Regulations 2001
- Defence Trade Controls Act 2012 (Vic)
- Autonomous Sanctions Regulations 2011
|Authorship Plan||An agreement between eligible authors as to potential publications and associated roles.|
|Breach||A failure to meet the principles and responsibilities of the Code. May refer to a single breach or multiple breaches.|
|Collaboration||Collaborative research is an umbrella term applied to researchers and or research institutions working together for a specified goal.|
|Conflict of Interest||A conflict of interest exists in a situation where an independent observer might reasonably conclude that the professional actions of a person are or may be unduly influenced by other interests. This refers to a financial or non-financial interest which may be a perceived, potential or actual conflict of interest.|
|Controlled Entity||A company over which the University has control.|
|Copyright||Copyright is a legal right given to the authors or creators of works.|
|Executive Author||Senior or corresponding author carrying responsibility for liaison with publishers, communication with all authors and contributors and the maintenance of all records concerning authorship.|
|Peer Review||The impartial and independent assessment of research by others working in the same or a related field.|
|Research Integrity||Integrity in research includes a commitment to the search for knowledge and understanding, to the recognised principles of research conduct, to the honest and ethical conduct of research, and to the honest and open dissemination of results.|
|Research Integrity Advisor (RIA)||
An experienced senior staff member appointed by the DVC (R&I) who assists in the promotion and fostering of responsible research conduct and provide advice to those with concerns about potential breaches of the Code.
An advisor in Research Integrity will have research experience, maturity, analytical skills, empathy, knowledge of the University's policies and management structure and a familiarity with accepted practice in research.
|Research Misconduct||A serious breach of the Code which is also intentional or reckless or negligent.|
|The Code||Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research|
|The Charter||Federation University Charter 2015|
The University adheres to the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research, (The Code) and requires all researchers and research managers to be familiar with it's provisions and to conduct their research and related tasks in accordance with these provisions and all other relevant legal, regulatory and policy requirements.
The University operates in accordance with the principles of a strong research culture, and will foster an environment where individuals:
- Conduct and manage research with honesty and integrity;
- Respect human research participants, animals and the environment;
- Demonstrate good stewardship of public resources used to conduct research;
- Appropriately acknowledge the role of others in research; and
- Communicate research results responsibly.
The University adheres to the Principles of responsible research conduct, as outlined in The Code:
|P1 - Honesty in the development, undertaking and reporting of research||
|P2 – Rigour in the development, undertaking and reporting of research||
|P3 – Transparency in declaring interests and reporting research methodology, data and findings||
|P4 – Fairness in the treatment of others||
|P5 – Respect for research participants, the wider community, animals and the environment||
|P6 – Recognition of the right of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples to be engaged in research that affects or is of particular significance to them||
|P7 – Accountability for the development, undertaking and reporting of research||
|P8 – Promotion of responsible research practices||
The above principles are the hallmarks of responsible research conduct at the University.
The University will ensure that research is conducted or overseen by staff (including Honorary, Adjunct and Visiting appointments) who have qualifications, research experience and skills relevant to the type of research undertaken in their role.
All researchers must be aware of and give consideration to legislative requirements in relation to:
|TYPE OF RESEARCH:||Applicable Legislation/Codes:|
|Research involving humans||Refer to the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007|
|Research involving animals||Refer to the Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes|
|Research involving genetically modified organisms||Refer to the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator|
|Research involving technology articulated in the Defence Trade Controls Act 2012||Refer to the Department of Defence|
|Australian Sanctions regimes||See here for further information|
The University also requires all research projects and practices to comply with all University ethical and safety policies and procedures, such as:
Research Export Controls Policy & Procedure (currently in draft)
The University recognises the right of researchers who conscientiously object to conducting research with, including but not limited to, human embryos, foetuses, embryonic or fetal tissue, or animals shall not be obliged to participate in such research, nor shall they be put at a disadvantage because of their objection.
The University requires that data and materials, which provide the basis of research outcomes, be preserved and managed in compliance with the standards set out in Principle 3 of The Code (as above).
In accordance with The Code (R8 and R22), the University will:
Provide access to facilities for the safe and secure storage and management of research data, records and primary materials and, where possible and appropriate, allow access and reference.
Retain clear, accurate, secure and complete records of all research including research data and primary materials. Where possible and appropriate, allow access and reference to these by interested parties.
The University requires, and has a responsibility to ensure, that research trainees be developed, mentored and supported, and their contributions be appropriately attributed, in accordance with The Code and University policies and procedures, including, but not limited to:
- HDR Supervision Policy
- Supervision of Higher Degree by Research Candidates Procedure
- Responsibilities for Supervision of HDR Candidates Procedure
- HDR Candidature Management Policy
- HDR Candidature Management Procedure
- Regulation 5.1
- Ethical Conduct of Research Policy
- Research Data Management Procedure
- Authorship Procedure
The University encourages research trainees/graduate students to seek guidance and requires their participation in induction and training in the responsible conduct of research, which is to include information regarding the address of conflicts of interest and the handling of allegations of breaches and research misconduct, as specified in University directives:
The University supports the wide dissemination of research data and research outcomes, subject to privacy, contractual and intellectual property considerations.
The University encourages researchers to consider multi-channel dissemination strategies for all research projects, and to incorporate these in their Authorship Plan. The University requires adherence to corporate Branding Guidelines and Media Relations Guidelines when executing dissemination strategies
The University requires that all reasonable steps be taken to ensure that published accounts related to research activities, performances and exhibitions are complete and accurate.
The University requires that publication information relevant to research performance be submitted in accordance with the requirements as per ERA published guidelines.
The University requires the accurate citation of the work of other authors, in accordance with the provisions in Principle 4 of the Code.
The University endorses the provisions in Principle 4 of The Code which specifies that it is a researcher’s responsibility to give credit, including authorship where appropriate, to those who have contributed to the research.
In addition, Responsibility 25 of The Code, states that a researcher is responsible for ensuring:
That authors of research outputs are all those, and only those, who have made a significant intellectual or scholarly contribution to the research and its output, and that they agree to be listed as an author.
The University holds that authorship eligibility is based upon the demonstration of substantial contribution, in a combination of:
- conception and design of the project
- analysis and interpretation of research data
- drafting significant parts of the work or critically revising it so as to contribute to the interpretation.
The University holds that the right to authorship is not tied to position or profession, and does not depend on whether the contribution was remunerated or voluntary in nature. The offer of authorship must be made to all eligible people, including research trainees, who meet the criteria for authorship as specified in The Code.
As specified in the Authorship Procedure, the University requires that authorship be confirmed for all research outputs, irrespective of the medium, that appropriate authorship be attributed to these outputs and that associated authorship records be maintained.
Federation University Australia must be attributed as the institution of affiliation by all Federation University staff, students and volunteers, and by conjoint, Adjunct and Honorary appointments where appropriate.
The University requires researchers to be knowledgeable of Federation University policies and procedures contained in:
Federation University recognizes the role played by independent assessment and comment in the research process and acknowledges the importance placed upon peer review
The University encourages researchers to seek and participate in peer review for the purposes of contributing to the emerging dialogue in their respective field/s of enquiry through the provision of informed comment and the identification of irrelevant findings, unwarranted claims, unacceptable interpretations, and personal views.
The University instructs staff, whose work is the subject of peer review, not to attempt to influence the process.
The University endorses Responsibility 28 of The Code and requires researchers to be knowledgeable of their responsibilities when undertaking the role of a peer reviewer. This includes participating in a way that is fair, rigorous and timely and maintains the confidentiality of the content whilst adhering to University directives contained in:
In accordance with Principle 3 of the Code and the University’s Conflict of Interest Policy, the University requires the disclosure and management of any potential, perceived or actual conflicts of interest in the course of any and all research conducted.
A conflict of interest is deemed to occur where there is a divergence between the individual interests of a person and their professional responsibilities such that an independent observer might reasonably conclude that the professional actions of that person are unduly influenced by their own interests.
The University recognises that conflicts of interest in the research area are common and may occur throughout the research process.
The University requires staff to be aware of and be knowledgeable about their obligations under The Code and relevant University policies and procedures, including the Conflict of Interest Policy and Conflict of Interest Procedure.
The University strongly supports participation in collaborative research, including interdisciplinary investigation, within the University, and between institutions nationally and internationally.
The University acknowledges that collaborations will take different forms, be of varying magnitude and duration and will utilise diverse instruments of agreement
In every form of collaboration, and in line with the Higher Education Standards Framework (6.1 Corporate Governance), the University requires that the policies and operations of proposed collaborators be consistent with the University’s directives. In the event that differing research practices exist between proposed collaborators and/or their institutions, the University requires that:
- researchers comply with The Code, with any proposed deviation needing University approval prior to participation;
- research integrity and accountability be maintained (as required by Higher Education Standards Framework Section 5.2 (4)).
Where collaboration involves formal contractual agreement, the University requires that staff proposing such collaborations to:
- notify and consult with the University
- Ãensure negotiations are undertaken by authorised and suitably experienced staff
- ensure proposed agreements are reviewed by Legal Services prior to sign-off
- ensure all agreements are documented and accessible.
External collaborative agreements must give consideration to:
- Intellectual property;
- Confidentiality and copyright issues;
- Sharing commercial returns;
- Responsibility for ethics and safety clearances;
- Managing conflicts of interest;
- Authorship criteria;
- Export Controls;
- Australian Sanctions regimes; and
- Reporting to appropriate agencies.
These considerations will be subject to compliance with the Code and relevant University policies and procedures.
In accordance with Principle 6 of the Code, the University recognises the right of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples to be engaged in research that affects or is of particular significance to them. All researchers will:
- Recognise, value and respect the diversity, heritage, knowledge, cultural property and connection to land of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
- Engage with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and respect their legal rights and local laws, customs and protocols.
- Engage with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples prior to research being undertaken, so that they freely make decisions about their involvement.
- Report to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples the outcomes of research in which they have engaged.
The University values the integrity of its researchers and that of the research they undertake.
The University demonstrates its commitment to research integrity by:
- adhering to, and promoting the principles of The Code;
- providing research integrity training;
- appointing Research Integrity Advisors.
The Code represents the core behaviours that characterise the responsible conduct of research. A failure to meet the principles and responsibilities set out in the Code is a breach of the Code. A breach of the Code occurs on a spectrum from minor breaches to those that are more serious. A serious breach of the Code that is carried out with intent or recklessness or negligence may be referred to as research misconduct.
The University views seriously the potential for actions which diminish actual and/or perceived research integrity and endorses preventative action be taken to mitigate foreseeable risks to research integrity including misrepresentation, fabrication, cheating, plagiarism and misuse of intellectual property, and inhibit the recurrence of associated breaches or misconduct. The University acknowledges the potential for allegations and complaints to be made regarding deficiencies and/or lapses in research integrity, including breaches of The Code and Research Misconduct.
In accordance with The Code, the University supports the detection and reporting of deficiencies or lapses in research integrity and will provide a framework that enables the timely address of allegations and the remedy of the situation. In responding to allegations related to research integrity, the University will:
- Be timely and consistent
- Ensure procedural fairness to all concerned
- Be transparent and promote confidence (internally and with the public)
- Ensure maximum opportunity for improvement
The University requires all staff to be aware of their obligation to report breaches and suspected misconduct in a timely manner and in accordance with The Code. The University requires staff to be knowledgeable of their respective responsibilities and the relevant courses of action relating to breaches of The Code, the Staff Code of Conduct Policy and suspected Research Misconduct. This includes a working knowledge of relevant University policies and procedures. Information on the investigative process can be found in the Research Integrity & Misconduct Procedure and in the Guide to Managing and Investigating Potential Breaches of the Code.
The University provides online training in Research Integrity (via Research Services).
All researchers (including students undertaking research) are required to complete the training, as follows:
- Initial completion of ‘Research Integrity, Second Edition’; and
- Completion of ‘Research Integrity, Concise’ every 3 years.
Completion of these modules will be monitored by Research Services, with compliance checks specifically undertaken for:
- HDR students;
- Researchers undertaking funded research; and
- Applicants to the Human Research Ethics Committee or the Animal Ethics Committee.
- The Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Research & Innovation (as the Approval Authority) is responsible for monitoring the implementation, outcomes and scheduled review of this policy and its accompanying procedure/s.
- The Director, Research Innovation & Enterprise (as the Document Owner) is responsible for maintaining the content of this policy as delegated by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Research & Innovation.
Others who have responsibility for ensuring compliance with this Policy include:
- Federation University Australia Research Committee
- Associate Deans of Research
- Research discipline leaders and Research Directors
- Research Services
- Deans are responsible for the conduct of research within their Schools and for the observance of this policy and related policies and procedures. In particular, this means having clear, documented processes for managing research work and ensuring any associated health and safety, environmental, business or financial risks are identified and managed. This includes research undertaken at any location substantially controlled by the University even though it may not be a University owned site.
- All researchers (including student researchers) must comply with the requirements of their discipline for quality research, and with the University requirements for safety, privacy, risk management, financial management and ethical acceptability and with any governing codes and legislation.
This policy will be communicated throughout the University via:
- A FedNews announcement and on the ‘Recently Approved Documents’ page on the University’s Policy Central website
- Distribution of e-mails to Head of School / Head of Department / University staff; and/or
- Documentation distribution, eg. posters, brochures
- Notification to Schools